EconReads
Donate

Cryptocurrency & Blockchain

Can Crypto Cut Remittance Costs?

Whether cryptocurrency can make sending money across borders cheaper and faster, and what experience so far suggests.

Migrant workers send hundreds of billions of dollars home each year. But sending money across borders can be slow and expensive. The World Bank has reported that the global average cost of sending 200 dollars has been around 6 percent, well above the international target of 3 percent. Crypto supporters argue blockchain technology can cut these costs.

The promise

  • Speed: crypto transfers can settle in minutes, at any time of day.
  • Lower fees: removing intermediaries could reduce costs.
  • Access: people without bank accounts could receive money with a phone.
  • Stablecoins, pegged to currencies like the dollar, avoid some volatility.

The reality

Experience has been mixed:

  • Converting crypto into local currency can be costly, and many recipients need cash.
  • Volatility: cryptocurrencies like Bitcoin can lose value between sending and receiving.
  • Regulation: many countries restrict crypto use, and anti-money laundering rules apply.
  • Usability: managing wallets and keys can be difficult for many users.

El Salvador promoted Bitcoin partly to cut remittance costs, but surveys found only a small share of remittances were sent through Bitcoin.

Competition from other innovations

Traditional remittance costs have been falling due to competition from digital money transfer companies and mobile money. Faster payment systems are being linked across borders; for example, India has linked UPI with payment systems in countries including Singapore and the UAE, allowing faster, cheaper transfers. The G20 has set targets to make cross-border payments cheaper and faster.

Stablecoins in practice

In some countries with unstable currencies or capital controls, such as Argentina and Nigeria, stablecoins are used for saving and cross-border transfers. Regulators worry about risks to financial stability and monetary control.

Two ways to send money home

A worker in Singapore wants to send money to his family in India. Through a traditional bank, fees and exchange rate margins take a noticeable cut, and the transfer takes a day or two. Through a linked UPI-PayNow transfer, it can arrive quickly at lower cost. Crypto is one option, but new public payment links compete directly.

Thinking crypto is the only way to cheaper remittances

Digital transfer companies, mobile money and linked national payment systems are also cutting costs. Crypto is one of several innovations, with its own risks.

Key takeaways
  • Sending money across borders has cost around 6 percent on average, above the 3 percent target.
  • Crypto promises speed and low fees but faces volatility, conversion costs and regulation.
  • El Salvador's Bitcoin push saw limited use for remittances.
  • Linked payment systems, like UPI with Singapore's PayNow, are also cutting costs.
4 min read

No recording for this one yet - EconReader can read it aloud for you.

Welcome to EconReads

This site is made for visually impaired learners, so our read-aloud reader is already switched on to help you explore hands-free.

You're in control - turn it off any time using the Reader button at the top of the page.

EconReader Ready