EconReads
Donate

Econ 101, Part 1: What Economics Actually Is

Efficiency vs Equity

The difference between making the economic pie as big as possible and dividing it fairly, and why policies often involve trade-offs between the two.

Two central goals in economics are efficiency and equity. Efficiency is about making the most of scarce resources. Equity is about fairness in how the results are shared. A common way to describe them is as the size of the economic pie and how it is sliced.

Efficiency

An economy is efficient when resources are used in ways that produce the greatest possible value. A useful concept is Pareto efficiency, named after economist Vilfredo Pareto: a situation is Pareto efficient if no one can be made better off without making someone else worse off.

Inefficiency means value is being wasted: for example, unused resources, goods that people would pay more for than they cost to make but are not produced, or pollution not accounted for.

Equity

Equity concerns fairness. People disagree about what is fair. Some focus on equal outcomes, some on equal opportunities, some on rewarding effort, and some on meeting basic needs. Equity is therefore partly a matter of values, not just economics.

The trade-off

Many policies involve trade-offs between efficiency and equity. Arthur Okun, an American economist, described redistribution as carrying money in a leaky bucket: when money is taxed from some and given to others, some is lost along the way through administrative costs and changes in incentives. The question is how much leakage is acceptable to achieve fairer outcomes.

A tax to fund school meals

A government raises taxes to fund free school meals. The taxes may discourage some work or investment, a small efficiency cost. But children who would otherwise go hungry are fed and learn better, an equity gain that may also bring future efficiency gains through a healthier, better-educated workforce. Weighing these is the core of many policy debates.

Not always a trade-off

Some policies improve both. Removing barriers that keep talented people from education or work, such as inaccessible schools for blind children, can increase both fairness and total output. Economists increasingly study where equity and efficiency go together.

Thinking efficiency means fairness

An efficient outcome can be very unequal. Pareto efficiency only says no one can gain without someone losing; it says nothing about whether the distribution is fair. Judging fairness requires values beyond efficiency.

Key takeaways
  • Efficiency is about making the most of resources; equity is about fairness.
  • Pareto efficiency means no one can be made better off without making someone worse off.
  • Okun's leaky bucket describes the efficiency costs of redistribution.
  • Some policies, like removing barriers to education, improve both efficiency and equity.
3 min read

No recording for this one yet - EconReader can read it aloud for you.

Welcome to EconReads

This site is made for visually impaired learners, so our read-aloud reader is already switched on to help you explore hands-free.

You're in control - turn it off any time using the Reader button at the top of the page.

EconReader Ready