EconReads
Donate

Wealth & Income Inequality

Why Inequality Has Grown Since the 1980s

The main economic forces most commonly cited for rising inequality in recent decades, and why economists still debate how much each one matters.

In many developed economies, income and wealth inequality have risen noticeably since roughly the 1980s, reversing a period of relatively narrowing gaps in the decades before. Economists generally point to several overlapping forces, rather than any single cause, to explain this shift.

The leading explanations economists point to

Skill-biased technological change describes how technology has increasingly rewarded highly skilled, highly educated workers disproportionately more than less-skilled workers, widening the pay gap between the two groups. Globalization - the international affairs module’s broader focus - increased competition for many domestic manufacturing jobs, putting downward pressure on wages in industries newly exposed to global competition. And declining union membership in many countries has reduced organized labor’s collective bargaining power over wages, particularly for less-skilled workers.

How these forces can compound each other

A manufacturing worker facing new competition from lower-cost overseas production, working in an industry with declining union membership, and lacking the specialized technical skills increasingly rewarded by employers, can face downward wage pressure from three separate directions at once - which helps explain why the overall shift has been so pronounced for some groups of workers specifically.

Why economists still debate the relative weight of each factor

Separating out exactly how much of rising inequality is attributable to technology, globalization, policy changes like tax rates, or declining union power is genuinely difficult, since these forces overlapped and interacted across the same time period. Different studies, using different methods and data, have reached somewhat different conclusions about the relative size of each factor’s contribution.

Assuming there's one single, agreed-upon cause

Public debate sometimes presents rising inequality as having one clear, dominant cause - just technology, or just trade policy, or just tax cuts. The genuine economic research generally points to multiple interacting causes, with real ongoing disagreement about their relative weight, rather than a single settled explanation.

Key takeaways
  • Inequality has risen in many developed economies since roughly the 1980s.
  • Skill-biased technological change, globalization, and declining union membership are commonly cited factors.
  • These forces likely overlapped and compounded each other rather than acting independently.
  • Economists still debate the relative weight of each factor - there's no single settled cause.
3 min read

No recording for this one yet - EconReader can read it aloud for you.

Welcome to EconReads

This site is made for visually impaired learners, so our read-aloud reader is already switched on to help you explore hands-free.

You're in control - turn it off any time using the Reader button at the top of the page.

EconReader Ready